← Back to Executive Order Summaries

Further Modifying the Reciprocal Tariff Rates

Executive Order: 14326
Issued: July 31, 2025
Federal Register Doc. No.: 2025-15010
Federal Register: HTMLPDF

This executive order modifies the reciprocal tariff structure initially established under Executive Order 14257 of April 2, 2025, which declared a national emergency based on the characterization that large and persistent U.S. goods trade deficits constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to national security and the economy. The order establishes a differentiated, country-specific tariff system detailed in Annex I, replacing the previous uniform structure. Annex I covers over 50 trading partners, including major economies such as the European Union, United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, India, Vietnam, Thailand, and Taiwan. The order categorizes partners into three tiers based on negotiation posture: those that have agreed to or are near concluding meaningful trade and security commitments (whose goods remain subject to Annex I rates until agreements are finalized); those offering insufficient terms or failing to align on economic and national security matters; and those declining to engage in negotiations. For the European Union specifically, the order implements a formula bringing total duties to a 15 percent floor for goods currently below that threshold, while goods already at or above 15 percent receive zero additional duties. Trading partners not listed in Annex I face a default 10 percent additional ad valorem duty. The modifications take effect seven days after July 31, 2025, with an exception for goods already in transit that enter before October 5, 2025. The order explicitly preserves the separate tariff structure for China established under Executive Order 14298.

The order establishes enhanced anti-circumvention measures with significant cross-government implications. Goods determined by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to have been transshipped to evade applicable duties face a 40 percent additional ad valorem duty in lieu of the Section 2 additional duty, plus any other applicable ordinary tariffs, fees, taxes, and penalties under 19 U.S.C. 1592, with no mitigation or remission of penalties allowed. The order mandates biannual publication of countries and facilities involved in circumvention schemes explicitly "to inform public procurement, national security reviews, and commercial due diligence," extending the order's practical effects beyond customs enforcement into federal procurement decisions, Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States reviews, and private-sector supply chain risk assessments. The Harmonized Tariff Schedule is modified through Annex II, terminating previous headings organized by duty rate and replacing them with trading partner-specific headings to facilitate the differentiated approach.

Implementation responsibility is assigned to the Secretary of Commerce, Secretary of Homeland Security, and United States Trade Representative, working in consultation with the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, economic and national security advisors, and the Chair of the International Trade Commission. Critically, Section 4 authorizes these officials "to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA" to effectuate the order, signaling authority that extends materially beyond tariff adjustments to potentially include non-tariff measures such as investment restrictions, financial controls, or other economic sanctions tools available under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The order establishes ongoing monitoring requirements, directing the Secretary of Commerce and Trade Representative to regularly assess circumstances related to the declared emergency and recommend additional presidential action if trading partners fail to address the emergency conditions, retaliate against U.S. actions, or if current measures prove ineffective. The tiered approach creates significant variation in bilateral trade relationships, with potential for escalation or de-escalation based on individual partners' willingness to conclude what the order characterizes as meaningful commitments on trade and security alignment.